Research_photo_grasp1

Neural decoding of full reaching and grasping movements.  Single-unit activity in motor cortical area M1 during naturalistic reaching and grasping movements. Raster plot showing the action potentials fired by 25 individual neurons over a span of 5.5 s. Raster plots are colored according to set specific relationships with kinematics (significant semipartial correlations >0.05.): blue, hand only; green, wrist only; red, hand only; orange, hand+wrist; magenta, hand+arm; black, hand+arm+wrist. Of the 30 neurons recorded in M1, only the 25 shown had set-specific relationships to at least one set of kinematic parameters. During the time span shown, the monkey performed three separate reach-to-grasp movements targeting a small ball. Grip aperture measures are overlaid over the raster plot to highlight the moments when prehension occurs (troughs). Top: The full posture of the arm is shown for four time points in the first movement.

From Objects to Actions
Carlos Vargas-Irwin 1, Lachlan Franquemont 1, Michael J. Black, John Donoghue 1

In this project we ask how objects are represented for grasping, how this representation evolves over time and how it is affected by context.  This work addresses questions in basic neuroscience but has implications for machine vision and robotics as well as in brain-computer interfaces. Our work focuses on naturalistic grasping activities in a range of contexts from free-reach-to-grasp scenarios to instructed-delay tasks.  We use motion capture to record behavior during complex grasping tasks with the aim of elucidating the underlying neural code enabling natural grasping.

Previous work has shown that ventral premotor cortex (PMv) is a key node in the parieto-frontal network specialized in transforming visual information representing object shape into hand postures best suited for grasping. These previous studies, however, use task conditions that do not separate two main factors: the visual features of the object and the motor strategy chosen to grasp it. It is not clear whether PMv operates in a primarily visual or motor regime, or if it transitions from one into the other at different times.

In order to address this question, we have developed an instructed delay task that includes objects that can be grasped using two different types of grips. All the objects share one common grip (power grip), but additionally can be grasped using an additional strategy unique to each object. We have recorded PMv ensemble activity in monkeys trained to perform different grips on cue using chronically implanted microelectrode arrays.

Grip selectivity has been described as a feature of PMv, but comparison of the same grips in tasks with differing temporal presentation of cues has not been pursued.  We examined the differences in neural activity associated with movements cued after an instructed delay (sequential condition) and movements cued at the moment of motor execution (simultaneous condition). While the sequential condition allows for planning in advance of the movement, movement planning and execution must be performed at the same time in the simultaneous condition.

Our results suggest that grip selectivity in PMv may be influenced by the prior conditions that set up the task, including the ability to plan upcoming actions. Further, these results suggest that the neural population activity during a movement is affected by the timing of the cues to lead up to the action.  Finally we find support for the hypothesis that objects may be characterized by their affordances - that is, their neural "representation" may "describe" how they may be grasped.

1 Brown University
Small_thumb_img_1772_crop2_small
Thumb_graspimagesmall
Decoding complete reach and grasp actions from local primary motor cortex populations
(Featured in Nature’s Research Highlights (Nature, Vol 466, 29 July 2010))
Vargas-Irwin, C.E., Shakhnarovich, G., Yadollahpour, P., Mislow, J.M.K., Black, M.J. and Donoghue, J.P.
J. of Neuroscience, 39(29):9659-9669, July 2010.